Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 17th August 2003, 11:24 PM
partypooper partypooper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,418
Default

The newspaper pre-post prices are really just "someones" ratings. Even using THE ABSOLUTE BEST RATINGS SERVICE IN THE COUNTRY" betting only overs, you would be borderline in producing a profit (proven time and time again) so how the hell are you going to win using the newspaper "FREE" pre-post prices?????, maybe with selective venues and or races, but with what guarantee of an on-going profit?????
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20th August 2003, 09:31 PM
Super Fox Super Fox is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 5
Default

Thanks guys. Can someone explain how to use the 9/4 system, I can't understand the 2,2,2,3,4,5,8,12,17,24,36. How many horses do you play?

BTW: I'm not dumb, just new to this.Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 20th August 2003, 10:32 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,415
Default

Quote:
On 2003-08-20 22:31, Super Fox wrote:
Thanks guys. Can someone explain how to use the 9/4 system, I can't understand the 2,2,2,3,4,5,8,12,17,24,36. How many horses do you play?

BTW: I'm not dumb, just new to this.Thanks.


Super Fox,

The 9/4 staking plan is probably different to what you were asking for.

The principle is to back your selection when it is paying in excess of $3.25 on the tote or 9/4 with the bookies.

The 2,2,2,3,4,5,8,12,17,24,36 referred to is the number of units to bet after a loss.

Let's say you have five bets at over $3.25 with the first four bets losing and the fifth one winning paying $3.25.

Microsoft Excel - Book1___Running: xl2002 XP : OS = Windows 98
(F)ile (E)dit (V)iew (I)nsert (O)ptions (T)ools (D)ata (W)indow (H)elp (A)bout
=

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
1
RACETABOUTLAY**UNITSDIVIDENDWINLOSSRUNNING**BALANCE
2
MR112****-2.00**-2.00**
3
MR232****-2.00**-4.00**
4
MR412****-2.00**-6.00**
5
MR5**23****-3.00**-9.00**
6
MR684$3.259.00**0.00**
Sheet1**

[HtmlMaker 2.42] To see the formula in the cells just click on the cells hyperlink or click the Name box
PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE THIS TABLE IMAGE ON SAME PAGE! OTHEWISE, ERROR OF JavaScript OCCUR.


Therefore you just broke even, any price over $3.25 you make a profit.

Hope this helps.


[ This Message was edited by: Chrome Prince on 2003-08-20 23:36 ]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 21st August 2003, 09:58 AM
puntz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To further clarify,if you have funds,


2-2-2-3-4-5-8-12-17-24 AND 36 UNITS
or

20-20-20-30-40-50-80-120-170-240 AND 360 UNITS


[ This Message was edited by: puntz on 2003-08-22 13:16 ]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 4th April 2006, 10:37 AM
Stix Stix is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,012
Default

Here's a thread that's been dusted up... (in my review of progressing betting)

I notice most people subscribe to a systems/ratings method (whatever method that fits your own punting profile) that produces a level stakes profit as the "preferred" or dominant approach to staking.

Does anyone here use progression betting?...successfully?

Progression betting from my limited reading and experience, IMHO requires :
  • nerves of steel
  • a healthy bank(s)
  • good strike rate (25%+)
  • good av. dividend
  • bucket loads of discipline and patience....in order to pay dividends.
I get the feeling there is a "get rich quick" stigma attached to a punter who uses progression betting.... but is that unfair?

If you bet "overs" and have a healthy strike rate, then surely this approach would be very profitable to 'you'......

If you bet progression to "strike" a number (i.e No.1, dog No.5, red/black etc.) then I think you are waving good by to your bank(s)....

Just hoping to "strike" anyone who uses progression betting as a norm. Would like to hear your thoughts

Thanks in advance
__________________
Stix
.......Giddy Up..... !!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 4th April 2006, 11:03 AM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,330
Smile STIX.

With 1 particular "system "I use the" 6 point divisor plan".

Contrasting FLAT stakes 22% on TO against 58% with the 6 point plan.

Because the system is based on WT/ TIME /FIELD STRENGTH RATINGS ( that is - rated right up to TODAYS race) in this instance I would have no hesitation in recommending this particular staking plan.

That has been my experience.

Cheers.
darky.

Last edited by darkydog2002 : 4th April 2006 at 11:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 4th April 2006, 03:19 PM
brownie brownie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 29
Default

Holy old posts Batman !!!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 4th April 2006, 03:27 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,330
Talking BROWNIE

Lets see if we can dig up AHJAYS ( the original AHJAY - Yep. there are 2 of em.

Cheers.
darky.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 4th April 2006, 03:38 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

I can't believe the amount of losing punters desperately trying to make new maths: 2+2 = 5 by 'special pleading' that old loss chasing fogy, progressive staking [a mathematical impossibility].
There is only one progressive staking method that works. Progressive staking after a win only if your can win at level stakes [never after a loss]. A progression after a loss will magnify your wins but will also magnify your losses and anyone contemplating progression staking has too many of those. Tilt.

Google to 'Dr. Maths' or any other of the maths sites and progressive staking is all doom and gloom. Maths, unlike stats cannot be manipulated. It's a hard task master of reality and it will shove 'special pleading' or 'strawman'
arguments right up your......if your silly enough to let it.

Last edited by crash : 4th April 2006 at 03:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 4th April 2006, 11:32 PM
Bhagwan Bhagwan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 2,428
Default

Heres a staking plan that can work even on a -25% level stake loss.

Which according to the experts, cant possible be done, they say its impossible, cant be done , you are all mad. I`m the maths genious here ,not you!....Why wont you lot listen to me?


Now,for those who dont wish to listen.

LADDER STAKING PLAN
112233445566778899 ect.
Continue up the ladder, win, loose or draw, until in profit, then start again.
$930 bank needed for a run of 60 bets.
OR
$1640 bank needed for a run of 80 bets.

Try targeting the RadioTABQ first & second selections.
First 4 races only.
The Selection is the one remaining after deleting the TAB Fav. 1 min till jump.

Sometimes the Fav is not in one of these 2 selections , if this happens , bet the shorter price of the 2 so as long it is not the Fav .

What we are attempting to do, is chase some value & on its day , it does just that.

Check it out on past results first before using this.

Cheers.
__________________
Cheers.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655