Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10th January 2005, 06:12 PM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,403
Default

Thats the truth Darky.....less filters means less complicated...filters help us to cut down on the bets....i think 5 is plenty
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10th January 2005, 08:47 PM
shoto shoto is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 126
Default

Yes. More filters usually means more backfitting, which can create great results from past results, but not so good results on future races. A recent quote of Bhagwan's is spot on - "trying to find patterns is like analysing shifting sands".

Filters need to be created out of a logical process first, and then applied to the data, rather than randomly trying things and keeping them if they happen to increase the profit over a set of past results.

Shaun: "Guys the Holy Grail is out there and being used by a select few that don't post on here" ... any more details on that one??
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22nd January 2005, 03:58 PM
Chuck Chuck is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,145
Default Can't Argue With Results

Last week:
MR1-1 X
AR 1st $2.80 & $1.40
PR 1st $4.20 & $1.70
CR X
WR 1st $1.40 & $1.10

Today:
SR1-1 1st $5.60
MR 4th
BR 4th
PR 2nd $2.00
WR X

Two week Win Outlay ($10 each): $100
Return : $140

More profits!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24th January 2005, 01:06 PM
Shaun Shaun is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 3,403
Default

Well as far as horse racing is concerned it has been spoken about on here before of backing the whole field....but i can't go in to it...last time it created a hell storm....but on a more moden note....what aout backing a selection then laying it back at a lower price for a definate profit....that seams to be the holy grail to me
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24th January 2005, 06:02 PM
Chuck Chuck is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,145
Default

sounds good to me!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th January 2005, 08:49 AM
yuckman yuckman is offline
Former Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 40
Exclamation Backing every horse in a race

Guys,
I've just run this data thru Bet Selector(Price Predictor) for all races in 2004.
Horses paying between $2 and $20 for the win were winning 86% of races, with a 15% LOT.
Horses paying between $1.10 and $20 got up in 93% of races- LOT was 15%.
Horses paying up to $10 won 80%, with a LOT% of 15%

That's just a single filter- Those of you that dutch bet could make a quid from that one!
__________________
why gobble with the turkeys, when you may soar with the eagles!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655