|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thats the truth Darky.....less filters means less complicated...filters help us to cut down on the bets....i think 5 is plenty
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yes. More filters usually means more backfitting, which can create great results from past results, but not so good results on future races. A recent quote of Bhagwan's is spot on - "trying to find patterns is like analysing shifting sands".
Filters need to be created out of a logical process first, and then applied to the data, rather than randomly trying things and keeping them if they happen to increase the profit over a set of past results. Shaun: "Guys the Holy Grail is out there and being used by a select few that don't post on here" ... any more details on that one?? ![]() ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Last week:
MR1-1 X AR 1st $2.80 & $1.40 PR 1st $4.20 & $1.70 CR X WR 1st $1.40 & $1.10 Today: SR1-1 1st $5.60 MR 4th BR 4th PR 2nd $2.00 WR X Two week Win Outlay ($10 each): $100 Return : $140 More profits!! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Well as far as horse racing is concerned it has been spoken about on here before of backing the whole field....but i can't go in to it...last time it created a hell storm....but on a more moden note....what aout backing a selection then laying it back at a lower price for a definate profit....that seams to be the holy grail to me
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() sounds good to me!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Guys,
I've just run this data thru Bet Selector(Price Predictor) for all races in 2004. Horses paying between $2 and $20 for the win were winning 86% of races, with a 15% LOT. Horses paying between $1.10 and $20 got up in 93% of races- LOT was 15%. Horses paying up to $10 won 80%, with a LOT% of 15% That's just a single filter- Those of you that dutch bet could make a quid from that one!
__________________
why gobble with the turkeys, when you may soar with the eagles!! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|