Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 15th August 2012, 03:57 PM
garyf garyf is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 359
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun
I personally think dutching is over rated in the true form and has little value to add.

I still think multiple runners in a race is a good idea but betting to prices with overlays and underlays is a better idea.

I do bet multiple runners and have not found the best option as yet but will avoid dutching as i hate having small amounts on my bigger overlays.
I agree with the 2nd sentence 100%
Eventually i got tired of seeing my,
Top rated priced at $3.9 win at $3.8,
In the end i allowed for 0.5 betting,
Point all horses for an underlay.

Say i priced a horse at $4.0 i would accept $3.50,
This also helped overcome the disgraceful %s bet,
In the far away Sydney and Queensland country meetings.

In saying that i am in pursuit of something mechanical,
Now that hopefully will eliminate this process.

The above made it possible to bet an underlay without to ,
Much compromising the rated price to an extent.

Cheers.
Garyf.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 15th August 2012, 04:05 PM
jose jose is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: brisbane
Posts: 419
Talking

LOL @ The Ocho
__________________
Jose'.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 15th August 2012, 05:36 PM
norisk norisk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 334
Default

................
__________________
"Now let me get this straight - Whatever I do don't bet this horse?"

Last edited by norisk : 15th August 2012 at 05:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 15th August 2012, 09:12 PM
Lord Greystoke Lord Greystoke is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrome Prince
The difference between Wall St and punting, the guys in the boiler room can get set for millions, if not billions, we are restricted to pennies by comparison before we are shut down.

Otherwise I'd be hopping a plane to New York city and showing them how to make huge percentage returns with almost no risk, without leaving their homes.
Alas, we are left to play dodgeball with the bookies for pennies.


OK so the boys in the pin stripes and braces can wield huge leverage, break the rules from time to time and get to play with tankers full of mulah belonging to someone else. Sorry, did I forget.. live like kings when the bonus comes in (and poncy princes in between).

There must be some possibilities around increasing our sorry lot?

4 examples of me having lost some marbles...

Leverage - All up / parlay into 1st 4 races then divert any profits into exotics for remainder of card. Hang on to your plums going into the last leg however.

Breaking 'the rules' - punt contrary to common misconceptions, myths wherever possible eg You can't win backing FAVs (Odds-on Fav's for the Place 24/7, anyone?)

Someone else's money - See 2. Scoop Joe P's $$$ off the top of the bigger pools on a regular basis, double your bank,transfer original stake back into your bank account and go again with Joe P's hard earned

Greed is Good - take some profit every week, month and go buy something just for yourself. When you crack the big quaddy you can get the drinks in at Pu$$y Cats and tell me how you done it !


LG
__________________
The trick isn't finding profitable angles, it's finding ones you will bet through the ups and downs - UB

Last edited by Lord Greystoke : 15th August 2012 at 09:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 15th August 2012, 09:27 PM
Barny Barny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,091
Default

Would anyone bother to consistently seek out a horse that's had at least 5 runs this time in without winning, and a winning % of let's say near enough to 20%. I'd call these horses overdue for a win ...........
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 15th August 2012, 10:19 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,031
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Greystoke
There must be some possibilities around increasing our sorry lot?

4 examples of me having lost some marbles...

Leverage - All up / parlay into 1st 4 races then divert any profits into exotics for remainder of card. Hang on to your plums going into the last leg however.

Breaking 'the rules' - punt contrary to common misconceptions, myths wherever possible eg You can't win backing FAVs (Odds-on Fav's for the Place 24/7, anyone?)

Someone else's money - See 2. Scoop Joe P's $$$ off the top of the bigger pools on a regular basis, double your bank,transfer original stake back into your bank account and go again with Joe P's hard earned

Greed is Good - take some profit every week, month and go buy something just for yourself. When you crack the big quaddy you can get the drinks in at Pu$$y Cats and tell me how you done it !


LG


You can't win backing FAVs (Odds-on Fav's for the Place 24/7, anyone?) - Since 6/08 I've had 47 bets for 46 wins. Well overdue for some losers but WOW WEE so far at least.

Leverage - Maybe parlay/all-up some of the place bets?

Scoop Joe P's $$$ off the top of the bigger pools on a regular basis
PLUS When you crack the big quaddy you can get the drinks in at Pu$$y Cats and tell me how you done it ! = System C
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 16th August 2012, 09:20 PM
Luxinterior Luxinterior is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UselessBettor
Barny,

I suggest you read winning without thinking.

It suggests that any system is taking advantage of a variance in the market. Due to everyone researching 100% of the time the advantage will diminish eventually as people find it and add their dollars to the odds reducing them to a non profitable situation.

This is the downfall of 99% of systems.

As an extension of this with regards to favourites.... with data bases, system development software, easier access to race video analysis and more, over the past ten or so years the information available to punters has grown incredibly.

As a result of this has the win % of favourites risen?
Also has the average dividend of these favourites fallen?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 16th August 2012, 09:52 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luxinterior
As an extension of this with regards to favourites.... with data bases, system development software, easier access to race video analysis and more, over the past ten or so years the information available to punters has grown incredibly.

As a result of this has the win % of favourites risen?
Also has the average dividend of these favourites fallen?
The favs percentage has remained the same.
The average dividend has remained the same.
Overall the estimate of the crowd of the favs chances has remained the same . But the overlay/underlay to the actual available odds from race to race has dimished.

It may have been 30 years ago that favs were 20% underbet on X occassions and 20% overbet on X occasions which cancel each other out. Today the 20% overbet is less likely to occur and its more like a 3% overbet or underbet range.

This is my thought on what has happened over time and has been researched by lots of people smarter then me. The strike rate is irrelevant. The average dividend is irrelevant. Its the opporuntity to take advantage of mis pricing which is relevant and the general research done by people much smarter then me (uni professors, doctrate research) indicates that the range of mispricing has been reducing more and more but especially in the last 10 years.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 16th August 2012, 10:16 PM
Luxinterior Luxinterior is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 26
Default

Thanks for the reply UB.
So, over the past 10 years the horse the crowd have made their favourite is starting at around the right price more often but that one they've bet on is not winning any more or less than before. Is that it?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 16th August 2012, 10:16 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luxinterior
Thanks for the reply UB.
So, over the past 10 years the horse the crowd have made their favourite is starting at around the right price more often but that one they've bet on is not winning any more or less than before. Is that it?

yep thats right.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:55 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655