It's not often they get the recognition for their toils in a very demanding industry but let me congratulate the officials for "sticking to their guns" and alerting the racing public to a change of tactics in upcoming races.
eg. in the upcoming race in Sydney, stewards have alerted punters that Mosso, is to be ridden off the pace. It is another tool to assist punters in their final decision. It may not be punters' "nirvana" but it is much appreciated.
As Mr Murrihy stated in yesterday's press, that it was vital to alert punters of such changes so they keep faith in the racing game. "If those punters lose confidence in the races, we'll have no industry at all."
Once again, salutations to the "tuned-in" officials.

Cheers

As I said in my post, this information does not "guarantee" success with Mosso running down the track.
However, in the longrun, it should be a useful tool to be utilised by punters.
Was the run of Orange County disappointing? Not necessarily if you listened to the comments of it's trainer this morning....whilst not giving a "go slow" warning about this runner, he indicated that it had been in the paddock for the last two weeks and would derive great benefit from it's hit-out today.

Cheers.

SR4 today(26.7.06-2:47p.m.EST) I was on Kilcornan which unfortunately struck it's head on the barrier and after a vet's examination was withdrawn. Frustrating?...yes!...but, I commend the stewards for protecting punters' interests. In my case, this action has protected my funds which I will reinvest later in the program.As I have said repeatedly...."when in doubt...take out!"
Congratulations to the stewards...keep up the good work!

Cheers.

I heard a comment from a person who is well and truly beyond his "use-by" date that Stewards should not have access to jockeys' telephone records in the days leading up to racedate.
As pointed out to him, this is common practice in Hong Kong and why shouldn't it become common practice here to ensure the 'integrity of racing."
Keep up the good work officials!

Cheers.

I have been closely following the unfolding of several recent steward's inquiries and wish to express my admiration for the impeccable manner in which the officials have addressed the issues, reviewed relevant evidence and made decisions which can only be seen as fair in the circumstances.
The interests of the betting public are of supreme importance and these "guardians of integrity" are to be encouraged and admired.
For a job which rarely receives many accolades let me, for one, congratulate you in your endeavours and keep up the good work!

Cheers.

As I have highlighted in this thread, the punting public owes a lot of gratitude to the Stewards, principally in Melbourne and Sydney.
However, the job is not done!...........there are still many instances of jockeys who appear to(how shall we say it.......?) not always ride their mount(s) out fully to the line.
Remain vigilant because without the scrutiny of these "integrity police" where would we, ie. the betting public be?
I can answer that question myself....we would be up that proverbial creek without a paddle!
In closing, Newcastle R4 today, several horses were inspected at the barrier and some were withdrawn. One of the inspected horses was declared fit to run...that horse being Onion which duly finished strongly to run third paying $1.5plNSW. While I am of the belief that "when in doubt....they are out" I respect the officials' determination on this occasion.

Cheers.

I normally have nothing but the utmost respect for racing officials but in a recent interview one official explained the change of riding tactics as alerted by connections.
Apparently the connections stated that they would go forward but in actual fact....due to "unforseen circumstances" they went back!
No enquiry....nothing....they just accepted the connections' explanation that they were "victims of circumstances!"
I ask you....what value are the hyped speed charts? Where is the appreciation of public confidence!
After this episode they mean nothing!
Are there any other form students who may feel that this episode warrants further discussion?
I look forward to your opinions.

Cheers.

SR1,

I backed both:
2 Somethin' Leicajem WON $3.7w$1.7plNSW
4 Judged(scr)
after apparently injuring itself at the barrier, Judged was subsequently scratched and my other horse won although there was a fall in the race and we may hear more.
However, I have nothing but praise for the stewards in scratching Judged:
as I always say-"when in doubt......take 'em out!"

Cheers.

There have been two late scratchings at Randwick today:
SR8 3 Oakland Lad(fav)
SR9 16 Lang(well supported)
I am sure that punters who had backed these runners would have been disappointed and groaned when they were withdrawn but I have nothing but praise for the officials who made these decisions.
Sure, it is frustrating to the punters but it is a lot better than supporting a runner which may have no realistic chance of winning/placing.
Both were injured in the barrier stalls and if allowed to run their supporters may have done their money "cold."
As I always say: "when in doubt....take them out!"
Thereby protecting punters' betting banks allowing them to invest on other races on the program.
Good luck to the stewards....keep up the good work!

Cheers.

I must commend the Steward's panel for the professional and exemplary manner in which they have addressed the current EI crisis. Particular mention should also be made to Greg Radley(2KY) and the ubiquitous Andrew Bensley(Racing Radio and Skychannel) for their efforts in this exhaustive and herculean task in keeping the general public and racing participants up to date with this scourge which has threatened the viability of the horse-racing industry and the livelihoods of nearly 50,000workers.
Job well done and good luck to you!

Cheers.