#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() How would I go about using mathematics in order to come up a profitable staking plan for betting 3 to 4 horses a day.
Are there any web sites that would help me? mad gambler |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It's an age old problem and would depend on how good the horses are [% of winners you get up and the odds you take], not how clever the maths are in staking.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() google for RETIREMENT STAKING PLAN
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mad Gambler
Crash is 100% right. Clever maths isn't going to help if your selections are no good. If you can't make a profit at level stakes, no staking plan is going to help. Don't let the Alchemists convince you otherwise. If your interested in a maths angle try: MiniMax Staking @ twonix.com It's quite straight forward. I use it for about 10 lay's each Saturday. You could also Google for info on the Kelly Criterion but beware you really need to know what your doing with it as it's not for the faint hearted. If you look a bit laterally you can turn some of the stock and option trading methods to your advantage. I'm not a fan of increasing stakes to chase losses so advise you to steer clear of plans like these if you think your selection method is a little iffy. Let us know what you turn up.
__________________
Pixie "It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash Last edited by Moderator 3 : 26th March 2007 at 10:50 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The success for the Kelly Criterion, or even the 1/2 or 1/4 Kelly is based on knowing the REAL odds of a horse winning [impossible], so it's a bit of a smoke and mirrors logic ****** and not suited to horse racing at all so don't be sucked in. Originally it was designed for the stock market I think, but I'm not 100% sure.
Anything by 'twonix' is worthwhile, as If I remember correctly he is a pro. punter [at least very serious] as well as a computer software programmer. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm not so sure that it's not suitable for horse racing but you need to be absolutely on top of your pricing, so perhaps it was not a great suggestion. It's not for the beginner. It's a method of discovering the optimum bet size to ensure maximum long term growth, and as such isn't really a staking plan. As you can see it's quite controversial. Look elsewhere - forget I mentioned it. It's origins were in an academic paper about the telephone system from memory.
__________________
Pixie "It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash Last edited by AngryPixie : 25th March 2007 at 03:00 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() One thing I do know about the Kelly is that it's a VERY aggressive staking plan. Aggression and punting are a sure way to the poor house:-)
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() crash, the trick is to be aggressive with THE BOOKIES money not yours!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
exactly why betting methods like the retirement plan & the like can & should be a godsend for many aimless punters, as they teach discipline & patience when used to the letter. they wont turn a losing strategy into a winner, but can certainly help refine ones selection skills whilst betting live without breaking the bank. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Aggression (uncontrolled) coupled with a poor betting plan - yes. But it's possible to have an aggressive (maximum boldness) strategy and pocket the profits.
__________________
Pixie "It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash Last edited by AngryPixie : 25th March 2007 at 08:55 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|