Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25th March 2007, 10:04 AM
Mad Gambler Mad Gambler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 167
Default Using Maths in Betting

How would I go about using mathematics in order to come up a profitable staking plan for betting 3 to 4 horses a day.

Are there any web sites that would help me?


mad gambler
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25th March 2007, 10:25 AM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

It's an age old problem and would depend on how good the horses are [% of winners you get up and the odds you take], not how clever the maths are in staking.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25th March 2007, 10:37 AM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

google for RETIREMENT STAKING PLAN
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25th March 2007, 01:36 PM
AngryPixie AngryPixie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default

Mad Gambler

Crash is 100% right. Clever maths isn't going to help if your selections are no good. If you can't make a profit at level stakes, no staking plan is going to help. Don't let the Alchemists convince you otherwise.

If your interested in a maths angle try:

MiniMax Staking @ twonix.com

It's quite straight forward. I use it for about 10 lay's each Saturday.

You could also Google for info on the Kelly Criterion but beware you really need to know what your doing with it as it's not for the faint hearted.

If you look a bit laterally you can turn some of the stock and option trading methods to your advantage.

I'm not a fan of increasing stakes to chase losses so advise you to steer clear of plans like these if you think your selection method is a little iffy.

Let us know what you turn up.
__________________
Pixie
"It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash

Last edited by Moderator 3 : 26th March 2007 at 10:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25th March 2007, 02:09 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

The success for the Kelly Criterion, or even the 1/2 or 1/4 Kelly is based on knowing the REAL odds of a horse winning [impossible], so it's a bit of a smoke and mirrors logic ****** and not suited to horse racing at all so don't be sucked in. Originally it was designed for the stock market I think, but I'm not 100% sure.

Anything by 'twonix' is worthwhile, as If I remember correctly he is a pro. punter [at least very serious] as well as a computer software programmer.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th March 2007, 02:57 PM
AngryPixie AngryPixie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
The success for the Kelly Criterion, or even the 1/2 or 1/4 Kelly is based on knowing the REAL odds of a horse winning [impossible], so it's a bit of a smoke and mirrors logic ****** and not suited to horse racing at all so don't be sucked in.


I'm not so sure that it's not suitable for horse racing but you need to be absolutely on top of your pricing, so perhaps it was not a great suggestion. It's not for the beginner. It's a method of discovering the optimum bet size to ensure maximum long term growth, and as such isn't really a staking plan. As you can see it's quite controversial. Look elsewhere - forget I mentioned it.

It's origins were in an academic paper about the telephone system from memory.
__________________
Pixie
"It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash

Last edited by AngryPixie : 25th March 2007 at 03:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th March 2007, 04:15 PM
crash crash is offline
Suspended.
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: gippsland lakes/vic
Posts: 5,104
Default

One thing I do know about the Kelly is that it's a VERY aggressive staking plan. Aggression and punting are a sure way to the poor house:-)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25th March 2007, 06:29 PM
partypooper partypooper is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,420
Default

crash, the trick is to be aggressive with THE BOOKIES money not yours!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25th March 2007, 08:06 PM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
Aggression and punting are a sure way to the poor house:-)


exactly why betting methods like the retirement plan & the like can & should be a godsend for many aimless punters, as they teach discipline & patience when used to the letter.

they wont turn a losing strategy into a winner, but can certainly help refine ones selection skills whilst betting live without breaking the bank.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25th March 2007, 08:51 PM
AngryPixie AngryPixie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crash
Aggression and punting are a sure way to the poor house


Aggression (uncontrolled) coupled with a poor betting plan - yes. But it's possible to have an aggressive (maximum boldness) strategy and pocket the profits.
__________________
Pixie
"It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash

Last edited by AngryPixie : 25th March 2007 at 08:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655