Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Racing
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th September 2002, 10:03 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi, Why are most track records held by small time horses? Group standard horses are in the minority. eg at Rosehill we only have Manikato 1400m, Danewin & Octaganal sharing 2000m.

horse cents
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14th September 2002, 07:38 PM
topsy99 topsy99 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: geeveston
Posts: 702
Default

i have spent time on track records over the years and generally several factors have an impact. weight carried. track conditions,
e.g. rarely should there be fast tracks due to damage to horses. and also i am suspicious that distances might be vague at times. i recall years ago races at flemington, moonee valley etc. were always exact distances but over the past 10-15 years theres 1409metres and all that sort of thing. some distances were unassailable for many years until horses like vo rogue arrived on the scene and broke most records.
on a true weight and distance measure the randwick 1600 record should almost be impossible to beat due to time set in an epsom handicap a few years ago.
if it is i would wonder particularly if by a lesser type of horse.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655