Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2nd April 2008, 09:52 AM
rumply rumply is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
Default chi-test

Hi all, 1st post here

have been reading with interest recent posts about the chi-test & would like someone to confirm my calcs, as they seem a bit too good to be true -

btw i bet place only & these are figures for the last 5 months-

average dividend $2.33
highest div $7.8
lowest div $1.1
pot 16.9%
runners 1111
places 557
loosers 554
% avg winners 50.1%
expected no of winners 414
expected no of loosers 697
chitest score - 0.00000000000000078

if anyone would care to offer their thoughts on the above results it would most appreciated

& also regards the average dividend - i have used unitab divs to calculate the figure above, but i bet solely with Betfair & on average achieve a better divy, esp with my longer priced selections

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 2nd April 2008, 11:30 AM
AngryPixie AngryPixie is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,070
Default That looks about right...

... although it's potentially a bit complicated due to the differences in market% due to field size when betting for the place. Ideally you'd be recording the market% of each race and normalise each selection individually, then aggregate the totals instead of using the average SP.

What the result is saying is that to this point it's very unlikely that what you've observed is due to luck. It's a tool, not a guarantee that things will continue along the same path, and assumes that the SP is an accurate indication of a selections chance.
__________________
Pixie
"It's worth remembering that profit isn't profit until it's spent off the racecourse." -- Crash

Last edited by AngryPixie : 2nd April 2008 at 11:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd April 2008, 11:32 AM
jfc jfc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 402
Default

I suspect very few people here could confidently perform a CHITEST.

For this Binomial Confidence Limits are much easier.

http://statpages.org/confint.html

557/1111 produces

47.15% as a lower bound.

For an average dividend of $2.33

Your expected POT is 9.9%

Most people would not sneeze at a POT that high.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd April 2008, 04:51 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,415
Default

rumply,

According to my benchmarks, that system is phenomenal, especially for 5 months results containing that many bets.

You are relying on 24 winners for the profit - a massive plus.

Get another 5 months under your belt, and I think you could successfully conclude it's a good'un.
The prognosis is for a long healthy life after the pathology results came back
__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 413,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/01/2025
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd April 2008, 06:22 PM
Mark Mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Qld
Posts: 1,400
Talking

Would anything survive the Hay Chee test??? Let's win win win.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 2nd April 2008, 06:49 PM
Chrome Prince Chrome Prince is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 4,415
Default

Maybe the Tai Chi test?

__________________
RaceCensus - powerful system testing software.
Now with over 413,000 Metropolitan, Provincial and Country races!
http://www.propun.com.au/horse_raci...ng_systems.html
*RaceCensus now updated to 31/01/2025
Video overview of RaceCensus here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W821YP_b0Pg
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 2nd April 2008, 07:51 PM
Chuck Chuck is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,145
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark
Would anything survive the Hay Chee test??? Let's win win win.


Just got to visualise it mate
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 2nd April 2008, 09:08 PM
rumply rumply is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrome Prince
rumply,

According to my benchmarks, that system is phenomenal, especially for 5 months results containing that many bets.

You are relying on 24 winners for the profit - a massive plus.

Get another 5 months under your belt, and I think you could successfully conclude it's a good'un.
The prognosis is for a long healthy life after the pathology results came back
hit my funny bone there Crome Prince, as 4 weeks ago i underwent my 1st Colonoscopy & recently went back to the surgeon for the results - a couple of polyps but thankfuly pathology all clear (too all you 45&> yolds out there - if you havent had one yet, you dont know what your missing!, ahh the joys of life & i get to do it all again in a few years...)

sorry bit too much personal info for a 2nd post i know, back to the punt

my selections are based on self generated ratings & then filtered for price, late market movements & a couple others that are no more than common sense, & as i hit the 1000+ bet mark thought it was time for some outside opinion.

thanks for all the replies

Last edited by rumply : 2nd April 2008 at 09:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655