Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
Reload this Page Long Shot 100 raters
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th August 2012, 09:45 AM
Vortech
Guest
  
Posts: n/a
Default Long Shot 100 raters
Reading some threads by other users and some small testing over the last couple of months, the following rules seem to be holding up ok if you can bear the run of outs. By using Bet Fair your long-shots can some nice value.

1. Don Scott Rank 1 - 5
2. Runners 14 and greater
3. 100 Unitab rater
4. Price $8.50 +

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17th August 2012, 12:22 PM
darkydog2002 darkydog2002 is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 4,332
Talking
Hey Enjay.
Long time and no word from you.
Gives a bell.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17th August 2012, 03:56 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,037
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vortech
Reading some threads by other users and some small testing over the last couple of months, the following rules seem to be holding up ok if you can bear the run of outs. By using Bet Fair your long-shots can some nice value.

1. Don Scott Rank 1 - 5
2. Runners 14 and greater
3. 100 Unitab rater
4. Price $8.50 +

Cheers

UB's system tester since August last year says the following:

There were 100159 horse form lines in the database at this point in time. We update when we get time.

There were 282 selections for the System
There were 266 races for the System
There were 28 Winners for the System for a strike rate of 9.93%
There were $363.48 returned for WIN (after 5% commission) which means a Profit or loss of $81.48 or a percentage profit/loss of 28.89%

Test Another System

The Rules used were : WinPrice >= 8.50 and rating = 100 and donScottRank >= 1 and donScottRank <=5 and runners >= 14
__________________
Never give up on a dream just because of the time it will take to accomplish it. The time will pass anyway.”

― Earl Nightingale
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th August 2012, 12:24 PM
garyf garyf is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 366
Smile
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ocho
UB's system tester since August last year says the following:

There were 100159 horse form lines in the database at this point in time. We update when we get time.

There were 282 selections for the System
There were 266 races for the System
There were 28 Winners for the System for a strike rate of 9.93%
There were $363.48 returned for WIN (after 5% commission) which means a Profit or loss of $81.48 or a percentage profit/loss of 28.89%

Test Another System

The Rules used were : WinPrice >= 8.50 and rating = 100 and donScottRank >= 1 and donScottRank <=5 and runners >= 14
With a 10% strike rate you should get 'APPROXIMATELY" these runs of outs.

No's of bets and losers in between.

10=7.5
100=26.9
1,000=49.2.
10,000=70.9.

Personally i myself wouldn't be able to handle the long runs,
Of outs waiting for a winner others may though.

Cheers.
Garyf.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 23rd August 2012, 11:30 AM
aussielongboat aussielongboat is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 259
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ocho
UB's system tester since August last year says the following:

There were 100159 horse form lines in the database at this point in time. We update when we get time.

There were 282 selections for the System
There were 266 races for the System
There were 28 Winners for the System for a strike rate of 9.93%
There were $363.48 returned for WIN (after 5% commission) which means a Profit or loss of $81.48 or a percentage profit/loss of 28.89%

Test Another System

The Rules used were : WinPrice >= 8.50 and rating = 100 and donScottRank >= 1 and donScottRank <=5 and runners >= 14


Don't want to rain on the parade - but i think UB system tester results could be flawed - maybe it gets the BF prices after they jump where the market spread can be 160%/60%
i have found i can tinker around with a few simple filters and i can easily go into a good profit - i.e +15% POT.

when i put the same filters into my own DB - more like -15%

just an observation - be careful.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23rd August 2012, 02:29 PM
bernie bernie is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 148
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by aussielongboat
Don't want to rain on the parade - but i think UB system tester results could be flawed - maybe it gets the BF prices after they jump where the market spread can be 160%/60%
i have found i can tinker around with a few simple filters and i can easily go into a good profit - i.e +15% POT.

when i put the same filters into my own DB - more like -15%

just an observation - be careful.
aussie, I have had the same problem. I find something that gives a good POT on the tester, but when I monitor it for any length of time the results are somewhat disastrous. Okay, I know it's backfitting but to go from +20% on the tester to -20% in testing is of some concern.

.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23rd August 2012, 02:39 PM
norisk norisk is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 334
Default
As pointed out in a recent thread there are issues with the place results of the tester, so I would suggest approaching the win results with equal caution.
__________________
"Now let me get this straight - Whatever I do don't bet this horse?"
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 23rd August 2012, 02:45 PM
aussielongboat aussielongboat is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 259
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by bernie
aussie, I have had the same problem. I find something that gives a good POT on the tester, but when I monitor it for any length of time the results are somewhat disastrous. Okay, I know it's backfitting but to go from +20% on the tester to -20% in testing is of some concern.

.

i wasn't talking about back fitting and then hoping for a future repeat.
i was talking about testing the same filters over the same period but testing it somewhere else - like on my DB for example.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23rd August 2012, 03:07 PM
UselessBettor UselessBettor is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,534
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by norisk
As pointed out in a recent thread there are issues with the place results of the tester, so I would suggest approaching the win results with equal caution.

Yeah place results are screwed on the site because of the wide ranges and lining up the palce markets with the win markets.

The win markets are ok though as they have a lot of checks to make sure the prices are right.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25th August 2012, 08:07 AM
aussielongboat aussielongboat is offline
Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 259
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vortech
Reading some threads by other users and some small testing over the last couple of months, the following rules seem to be holding up ok if you can bear the run of outs. By using Bet Fair your long-shots can some nice value.

1. Don Scott Rank 1 - 5
2. Runners 14 and greater
3. 100 Unitab rater
4. Price $8.50 +

Cheers


in the period from aprill 11 until july 2012 these are the results using tattsbet prices

starters 650
places 143
plc profit -150
winners 54
win profit -22
win pot -3%
win sr 8%


cheers

aussie
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Contact Us - OZmium Pty Ltd - Archive - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655