I have been using them for a while now, getting lots of good price winners, quinella's and trifecta's. wondering if anyone else uses them and what they think of them.In the last couple of weeks i started to use my own ratings system [yesterday 12 races - 4 trifecta's]and didn't use the neural's and in R2 Brisbane they picked 1-3-2-12-11-9 and the first 4 [12-2-9
11] paid $30,655.80. ************. I normally take the top 4 in a standout with another 2 for a place,even then, the tri would have been nice $1,011.

hi goldmember
what settings do you have them on i leave mine on the settings that are already there except
JT = 0
BP = 5
$ = 5
DLR = 5
cya ginger

Hi, Goldmember.

I have been looking at the neurals for a few years now, and have tested many settings, types of races, etc.

My methods have always been successful for a short period and then ultimately crash. I've looked at all types of betting too. Maybe I haven't yet discovered the key.

hi goldmember i experimented with them some time back and got some good results, the problem i had was consistancy , could not decide on the best settings and so decided to leave them for a while till some one can get the settings right.

I have found the Neurals to be most useful for midweek, provincial and country racing.

I particularly like them to frame a market and look for value amongst the top three or four rated horses whose neural rating is at least 75% of the top rated horse.

Here are the settings I use:

CP 4
CF 2
Tim 1
JA 1
TA 1
JT 0
BP 1
WT 1
CRS 1
Dst 2
$ 3
DLR 1

Hope you find this of some help.


Cheers,
Luckyboy

I have found this method has some very good days.
Settings.
CP1
CF0
The rest left at the standard setting.

We target races where one of the top 2 is starting from barrier 1 ,then back the other one of the 2 which will be starting from barrier 2+ to win.

We are assuming the majority of barrier 1 will fall over.

It restricts the bets & some of the divs are very good.

__________________
Cheers.

Hi,had a short spell,i use these settings:
CP 4
CF 4
TIM 4
JA 4
TA 3
JT 2
BP varies from track to track
WET varies from good to heavy
CRS 4
DIST 4
$ 3
DLR 0- 1000m, to 5- 2400m+

I dont rate JT too highly because most jocks are freelance
BP: iv'e got a listing of barrier starts for all TAB tracks in australia and rate them accordingy EG; Flem, Caulfield 1400m [5] bad starts, Ballarat, Sandown [0] for all starts
[you can get them from most sites, skychannel, racenet etc.]
WET 0 - good
1 b/side dead
2 w/side dead
3 b/side slow
4 w/side slow
5 heavy

DLR 0 1000
1 1100,1200
2 1300,1400
3 1500,1600
4 1700 - 2300
5 2400+
Just try different combinations one day after a meeting is finished and see what acheives the best result.
I mainly use them on saturdays, and the better class meetings,i forget poor distance races, fields with poor form and 2 year old races where there are a few 1st starters.

Settings I worked out some time ago and had a fair bit of success with:

Leave out below class 3 races, 2yr. olds, fillies and mares, hurdles. I personally also leave out 1000m [or less] races.


Up to 1450m. 3422 1110 1131
1451m to 1850m. 3322 1100 1130
1851m to 2450m. 3320 0000 2120

I bet the first 2 to win or have a 2x4x5 tri. Had some very nice collects.

Cheers.


[ This Message was edited by: crash on 2004-03-19 08:02 ]