Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 27th October 2004, 10:00 PM
bwheatle bwheatle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Barry Wheatley
Posts: 25
Default

Somewhat sadly, I don't have records going back far enough to verify my little system for picking the Melb Cup Trifecta. Any feedback from Forummers that have more data would be greatly appreciated.

I've always suspected that the most lightly raced runner in the market has the best chance in the Melbourne Cup, but I can't find anywhere on the Net these records. Finding the fields - no problem, but the age and sex and no of starts of each runner? Impossible.

That's theory one, which can easily be debunked I guess.

Theory two, is that entires don't like passing mares at the best of times, and never when the mares are on heat. Too many mares in the Melb Cup and too great one or more has the hots. Reckon they'd rather stay back and sniff around. OK, unorthodox theory - maybe.

So, theory test? Firstly, divide starts by age and rank field accordingly. Then eliminate entires, and last year the selections would have been Makybe Diva, She's Archie, Zagalia and Jardine's Lookout.

Hindsight's such a wonderful thing!!

The only other year I have these stats for is 2001. This same formula yielded Maythehorse, Ethereal,Persian Punch and Karasi. The result was Ethereal, Maythehorse and Karasi.

Does anyone have the results for other years to test?

Might be a system here?? Might be rubbish, and retrofit.

I recall that Vintage Crop would have rated 1st on the lightly raced factor. Kingston Rule probably would have as well. But, my records are lousy. Memory, which is sadly lacking.

Gut feeling? Well, as any of the serious punters on the forum know well, that'll only lead to a bad stomach ache!!!

Any further stats re Melb Cup would be greatly appreciated. Such an enormous pool for us forummers to get our teeth into!!!!!





Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28th October 2004, 01:39 PM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

gday bwheatle, ive got the melb cup best bets going back about 7-8 years i would guess so will dig them out over the next couple days & give your theories a workout




[ This Message was edited by: stugots on 2004-10-28 14:40 ]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29th October 2004, 02:50 PM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

no good in the few years i looked at 2000/1999/1998 soi stopped there although 1997 looked ok with might&power, but i could have tipped you that one

probably a good idea to box the 1st 4 each year just in case
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29th October 2004, 06:15 PM
bwheatle bwheatle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Barry Wheatley
Posts: 25
Default

Thanks for that Stugots, really appreciated. Of course, Murphy's Law would have it that it would only hold up for the two years I had the data for!!

Back to the drawing board - but I'll still take a 4 horse box just in case!!



Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30th October 2004, 07:38 AM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

Quote:
On 2004-10-29 19:15, bwheatle wrote:
Thanks for that Stugots, really appreciated. Of course, Murphy's Law would have it that it would only hold up for the two years I had the data for!!

Back to the drawing board - but I'll still take a 4 horse box just in case!!


as will i :smile:
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31st October 2004, 07:11 PM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

hope you dont mind bwheatle but heres the selections for the system -

RAZKALLA (USA)
DISTINCTION (IRE)
MEDIA PUZZLE (USA)
WINNING BELLE (NZ)
DON RAPHAEL


looks like the locals may be in a spot of bother



[ This Message was edited by: stugots on 2004-10-31 20:13 ]

[ This Message was edited by: stugots on 2004-10-31 20:18 ]

[ This Message was edited by: stugots on 2004-10-31 20:19 ]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31st October 2004, 10:50 PM
bwheatle bwheatle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Location: Barry Wheatley
Posts: 25
Default

Quite right Stugots,

While difficult to see these imports running the tri, I'll take it nonetheless. In the rare event they salute, we'll bank a fortune!!

As for Winning Belle? According to history, and Bart Cumming's, mares don't back up well from runs on the Saturday prior. Still, Winning Belle's lightly raced and with the 80/1 available on Betfair have had a coverer.

Don Raphael? Well, he's travelled 20.5 kilometers prior to coming in to the cup. That's well above the average lead up. The only winner to have covered such distance prior was Media Puzzle. Still, huge odds available on this happening.

Certainly, if the bookies are to be believed, then history will be made on Tuesday.

Makbye Diva will need to overcome enormous historical obstacles. No mare has won a Melb Cup carrying this weight. The nearest was the giant Empire Rose that carried 53.5 kgs. No mare has won the cup two years in a row. And, no Sydney Cup winner has won the Melbourne Cup in the same year. Given that there's been
144 Melbourne Cups, I'd be looking for odds of 144/1.

Vinnie Roe's topweight, carrying 58 kgs. Historically, around 50/1 might tempt me.

Having said that, these two (at least according to the bookies) will run the quinella.

Ever compared the cars in the bookies to the cars in the punters carpark?

Say no more!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 1st November 2004, 10:10 AM
stugots stugots is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 879
Default

my own working so far have indicated that distinction & media puzzle are the only raiders with realistic chances & i will certainly be including them in my other exotics.

razkalla - who? but i guess godolphin will win one one day

the don - love to see a horse & trainer like this win but hmmm not this year.

winning belle - what you said.

but after all that there is no harm in boxing them, just in case & wouldnt it be sweet

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655