#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() After reading Michaelg's Neuralmania it got me thinking about the rules and with all the investigation I've done on the Neurals I prefer the CF, TIM and $ approach (rather than CP, CF and $ of Michaelg's rules).
The only other change to Michaelg's rules is the qualifier must have run 1st or 2nd last start Since 6th May there have been 24 selections for 10 winners (S/R 41.7%) and 19 places (S/R 79.2%). Win Bank $7.90 - 32.9% POT % Place Bank $6.64 - 27.7% POT % It will be interesting to see how it goes. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Try,
since 7 May my method has produced 23 selections for 7 winners for a POT of 7.8%, and 17 placegetters for a POT of 6.5%. A huge difference with your method coming out way on top. It looks like under the circumstances that the TIM could be more accurate than CP. As you say, it will be interesting to see how it goes. Last edited by michaelg : 11th May 2009 at 02:42 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Michaelg,
I can not thank you enough for throwing up these little systems which has got me thinking on how I can improve (hopefully) on them. You have give me (and everyone else) ideas which we have not even thought of. If we can all benefit with everyone throwing ideas around then we will all be better off, especially financially! Well done again (I seem to say that a lot with your ideas)! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks, Try - its appreciated.
Because each of our current systems have logic - our neural settings give the selections an odds-on chance of winning, and they have good current form - that I suppose we can have some degree of confidence in them. And its good that there are an acceptable number of selections, unlike the Unitab 100 pointers methods. As you say, it will be interesting (and hopefully profitable/exciting) to see how it goes. Last edited by michaelg : 11th May 2009 at 06:42 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Michaelg,
When you are reporting your successes/failures what TAB dividend are you using? I use Sportsbet's Citybest+ for Metro meetings and Country Best (best of NSW and Vic tote) for non Metro meetings. When I apply these dividends to your results I get a much higher POT% than the figures you quoted (>20% for the win dividends compared with the 7.8% you quoted). As we all have said it is very important to get the best odds available and not rely on a single Tote. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Totally agree TTA,
This game is hard enough and getting a better price than the tabs is one of the easier things to do. Can make aaaa of difference!! Cheers Twodogs |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() For the Neurals Odds-on there are 2 selections today
Canterbury R2#3 Sixty Four Mornington R3#4 Norwegian Good luck to all who follow these selections! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi, Try.
I use NSW TAB. However, if it continues to perform I will certainly look at Sportsbet. The difference is so much greater especially with Win betting. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() One winner ($1.70/$1.20), one unplaced.
Always tomorrow! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Only one selection today
Sunshine Coast R2#3 Carry On Dancer |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|