Smartgambler
Pro-Punter

Go Back   OZmium Sports Betting and Horse Racing Forums > Public Forums > Horse Race Betting Systems
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark all topics as read

To advertise on these
forums, e-mail us.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th December 2010, 04:56 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default Calling Raven

Hi Raven,

Not sure I'm allowed to pursue this, but you put it up on a public thread, so lets see how we go?


What do you do when more than one selection in a race?
It happens!

Strictly according to the rules re position on the turn and also on previous runs, I excluded the races where this info was not available, which is most prov. races and some met races as well.

Where it was available, and complied with your specs. it performed exactly 100% worth than when ignored. Ie. half the return.

Works only on met. races, mostly on Saturdays, (that's where I looked first) but this year it was treading water on Saturdays until November and then it picked up really well in the last 6 weeks, so much so that it was in profit for the year.

Unfortunately before that, there were outs of up to 28.
this is only preliminary because I didn't know what you do with multiple selections.

Most of the profit came from odds over $5.00 to $ 15.00 although some shorties came in as well.

Good luck with it.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13th December 2010, 06:53 PM
Raven Raven is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 225
Default

Thanks lomaca,

Im surprised to hear it was treading water early this year. But, in particular the freshen up horses, have had a few losing years when i was researching this, so it does happen. But overall the performance was solid. It always bounces back after a bad year too.

If there are 2 selections in a race, i'd back both. If they were 1st & 2nd faves i'd probably leave the race alone though. If we were unlucky to have 3, i'd back the 2 roughest. I generally dont bet below $4 so Im more inclined to back the longer priced selections. This is just a simple system afterall, and Id magine the profit is in the higher priced selections long term. I also think we can get better overs on Betfair when the prices are longer.

And yes the last 2 months have been good. It continued on Sat, 2 winners from 3 bets.

I will admit that i've chopped and changed the rules as i've reasearched this through the year. Its in profit for the year all up. The rules i have now are quick and simple to go through, which is part of the deal.

For the record, I'm only having 0.5% bets for the win only
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13th December 2010, 07:09 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raven
Thanks lomaca,

Im surprised to hear it was treading water early this year. But, in particular the freshen up horses, have had a few losing years when i was researching this, so it does happen. But overall the performance was solid. It always bounces back after a bad year too.

If there are 2 selections in a race, i'd back both. If they were 1st & 2nd faves i'd probably leave the race alone though. If we were unlucky to have 3, i'd back the 2 roughest. I generally dont bet below $4 so Im more inclined to back the longer priced selections. This is just a simple system afterall, and Id magine the profit is in the higher priced selections long term. I also think we can get better overs on Betfair when the prices are longer.

And yes the last 2 months have been good. It continued on Sat, 2 winners from 3 bets.

I will admit that i've chopped and changed the rules as i've reasearched this through the year. Its in profit for the year all up. The rules i have now are quick and simple to go through, which is part of the deal.

For the record, I'm only having 0.5% bets for the win only
For simplicities sake I took the days to last start as 70 which covers both, resumers and all, not hard to do in the way you specified either.

The fact that you pick your winners from the qualifiers, and also that you bet on more than one, explains your better result.

I just picked the highest TAB number, but I saw many times that the other selection actually won, so that's where the difference lies.

I found it better for the win than the place, overall not a bad little system, the simpler the better I say.

Have fun with it and good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14th December 2010, 04:28 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
For simplicities' sake I took the days to last start as 70 which covers both, resumers and all, not hard to do in the way you specified either.
Yes, what a difference a day makes as they say!

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th December 2010, 06:52 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
Yes, what a difference a day makes as they say!

Good luck
I hope it's not too cryptic?
I meant to say following your rules made a hack of a difference in the positive!

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15th December 2010, 12:27 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Caulfield race 2 No 10 Bellabaci and No 8 Olympic Win

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15th December 2010, 12:47 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
Caulfield race 2 No 10 Bellabaci and No 8 Olympic Win

Good luck
Randwick race 7 No 9 Bullant
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15th December 2010, 01:46 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
Randwick race 7 No 9 Bullant
PS
in the Cau, race only Olympic Win qualified with the <= 4 at the turn for the last and at least one other of the last 2 previous races, although I found the POT much worse if taken into consideration anyway.

The third place getter 9-TWIGINTHEDESERT qualified in all but the days to last start and paid $4.80 for the place.
'--------------------------------------------------
The runner in race 7 at RAN is qualifying in all respect according to Raven's rules.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15th December 2010, 02:18 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
PS
in the Cau, race only Olympic Win qualified with the <= 4 at the turn for the last and at least one other of the last 2 previous races, although I found the POT much worse if taken into consideration anyway.

The third place getter 9-TWIGINTHEDESERT qualified in all but the days to last start and paid $4.80 for the place.
'--------------------------------------------------
The runner in race 7 at RAN is qualifying in all respect according to Raven's rules.

Good luck.
Hi Raven,
it's your system, if you don't want me to post the selections just holler!

I thought I post it for a few weeks when I have time, but it's your call.

Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15th December 2010, 03:55 PM
lomaca lomaca is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lomaca
Randwick race 7 No 9 Bullant
Incidentally my own rating for this race is:

5,6,4,3
Finished betting but will watch!

Good luck
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2008 OZmium Pty. Ltd. All rights reserved . ACN 091184655