#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Had a look at the recent results of my old 1-1 system for Saturday, and i was pleasantly suprised!
SR01-1 1st MR01-1 3rd BR01-1 2nd AR01-1 2nd CR01-1 1st WR01-1 1st TR01-1 1st Selections: 7 Places: 7 Wins: 4 (Return $12.40) Rules for those who don't know them: -Race 1 Number 1 -Inside $8.00 -Barrier 1-8 Chuck |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Not much joy in this one Chuck.Sorry.
3 years results . BETS = 4649 /WINS 991/STRIKE RATE 21.32 % LOSS ON TURNOVER = 19.46 % Cheers. Darky. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() darky, could you check some results for me too?
I have been doing ok with a place system for a while but it has recently turned against me. I was wondering what kind of results it gives historically to determine whether to continue with it or not. I guess this should be in the system thread really but anyway the rules are: 1. #1 - Top Weight or Equal Top Weight 2. Won last start unless first up after a spell 3. Ran in last 14 days 4. <= 12 runners As I say, this is a Place system Any feedback would be appreciated. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Over 3 years.
WIN 884 bets/215 wins/Strike rate 24.32 %/LOT 20.93 % PLACE 884 bets/496 places /Strike rate 56.11 %/LOT 13.69 % 1ST UP 122 bets /19 wins /win % 15.57 %/LOT 44.84 % PLACE 122 bets /51 places /Strike rate 41.8 %/LOT 27.6 % Cheers. darky. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sorry Chuck I tried that one 16 years ago but could not make a profit.Please keep trying as the" Holy Grail" is out for we mortals to find.
Cheers, Ron. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks Darky....I'll keep looking for a system!
It's amazing how a small sample can throw you out. My own is based on 100 races and gave: Win SR 28% LOT -25.1% Place SR 71% POT 8.5% There's a big difference in the Place strike rate in my sample and the historical data over 3 years. Last edited by gizzard : 10th January 2005 at 02:35 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Guys the Holy Grail is out there and being used by a select few that don't post on here
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The more filters you have the less likely is a system to perform.
Cheers. darky. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thats the truth Darky.....less filters means less complicated...filters help us to cut down on the bets....i think 5 is plenty
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Hi Gizzard! The most important factor to look for when you checking past data is the possibility that there was an abnormally high win or place return! These have to be descarded if you want to have a realistic statistical result. Unless of course you are deliberately targeting long shots. Cheers! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|